Israel vs Mauritania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Israel
80.03 cubic meters
in 2021
Mauritania
82.04 cubic meters
in 2022
Israel rank
174th
Mauritania rank
172nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Israel
  • Mauritania
100200300400500196119912022

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 82.04 cubic meters against 80.03 cubic meters in Israel, a difference of 2.01 cubic meters.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 174th and Mauritania ranks 172nd of 183 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 296.45 cubic meters 423.27 cubic meters 126.83 cubic meters Mauritania
1970s 222.4 cubic meters 319.28 cubic meters 96.88 cubic meters Mauritania
1980s 179.02 cubic meters 239.3 cubic meters 60.28 cubic meters Mauritania
1990s 138.4 cubic meters 178.48 cubic meters 40.09 cubic meters Mauritania
2000s 109.4 cubic meters 137.62 cubic meters 28.23 cubic meters Mauritania
2010s 90.47 cubic meters 102.92 cubic meters 12.45 cubic meters Mauritania
2020s 80.71 cubic meters 85.72 cubic meters 5.01 cubic meters Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Israel or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 82.04 cubic meters against 80.03 cubic meters in Israel as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Israel and Mauritania?
2.01 cubic meters, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Israel and Mauritania rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Israel ranks 174th and Mauritania ranks 172nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Mauritania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/israel/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/israel/mauritania/">Israel vs Mauritania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.