Israel vs Malta: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Israel
80.03 cubic meters
in 2021
Malta
95.08 cubic meters
in 2022
Israel rank
174th
Malta rank
171st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Israel
  • Malta
100200300196119912022

How they compare

Malta currently reports 95.08 cubic meters against 80.03 cubic meters in Israel, a difference of 15.05 cubic meters.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 174th and Malta ranks 171st of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 4 and Malta in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 296.45 cubic meters 159.51 cubic meters 136.93 cubic meters Israel
1970s 222.4 cubic meters 165.46 cubic meters 56.94 cubic meters Israel
1980s 179.02 cubic meters 151.2 cubic meters 27.82 cubic meters Israel
1990s 138.4 cubic meters 134.95 cubic meters 3.44 cubic meters Israel
2000s 109.4 cubic meters 125.76 cubic meters 16.37 cubic meters Malta
2010s 90.47 cubic meters 113.62 cubic meters 23.15 cubic meters Malta
2020s 80.71 cubic meters 97.71 cubic meters 17 cubic meters Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Israel or Malta?
Malta, at 95.08 cubic meters against 80.03 cubic meters in Israel as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Israel and Malta?
15.05 cubic meters, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Malta?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Israel and Malta rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Israel ranks 174th and Malta ranks 171st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Malta: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/israel/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/israel/malta/">Israel vs Malta: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.