Indonesia vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Indonesia
7,240 cubic meters
in 2022
Nepal
6,670 cubic meters
in 2022
Indonesia rank
56th
Nepal rank
59th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Indonesia
  • Nepal
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119912022

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 7,240 cubic meters against 6,670 cubic meters in Nepal, a difference of 570 cubic meters.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 56th and Nepal ranks 59th of 183 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 20,000 cubic meters 17,742 cubic meters 2,257 cubic meters Indonesia
1970s 15,572 cubic meters 14,467 cubic meters 1,105 cubic meters Indonesia
1980s 12,296 cubic meters 11,516 cubic meters 780.03 cubic meters Indonesia
1990s 10,205 cubic meters 9,089 cubic meters 1,116 cubic meters Indonesia
2000s 8,807 cubic meters 7,621 cubic meters 1,186 cubic meters Indonesia
2010s 7,774 cubic meters 7,133 cubic meters 640.83 cubic meters Indonesia
2020s 7,293 cubic meters 6,746 cubic meters 547.67 cubic meters Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Indonesia or Nepal?
Indonesia, at 7,240 cubic meters against 6,670 cubic meters in Nepal as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Indonesia and Nepal?
570 cubic meters, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nepal?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Indonesia and Nepal rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Indonesia ranks 56th and Nepal ranks 59th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/indonesia/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/indonesia/nepal/">Indonesia vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.