IDA blend vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

IDA blend
2,842 cubic meters
in 2022
Sweden
16,306 cubic meters
in 2022
IDA blend rank
35th
Sweden rank
37th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • IDA blend
  • Sweden
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119912022

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 16,306 cubic meters against 2,842 cubic meters in IDA blend, a difference of 13,464 cubic meters.

That makes Sweden's figure about 5.7 times IDA blend's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

IDA blend ranks 35th and Sweden ranks 37th of 45 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 13,896 cubic meters 22,109 cubic meters 8,213 cubic meters Sweden
1970s 10,728 cubic meters 20,908 cubic meters 10,180 cubic meters Sweden
1980s 7,814 cubic meters 20,438 cubic meters 12,625 cubic meters Sweden
1990s 5,537 cubic meters 19,531 cubic meters 13,994 cubic meters Sweden
2000s 4,205 cubic meters 18,916 cubic meters 14,711 cubic meters Sweden
2010s 3,312 cubic meters 17,487 cubic meters 14,175 cubic meters Sweden
2020s 2,900 cubic meters 16,413 cubic meters 13,514 cubic meters Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, IDA blend or Sweden?
Sweden, at 16,306 cubic meters against 2,842 cubic meters in IDA blend as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between IDA blend and Sweden?
13,464 cubic meters, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do IDA blend and Sweden rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
IDA blend ranks 35th and Sweden ranks 37th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/ida-blend/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/ida-blend/sweden/">IDA blend vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.