Iceland vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Iceland
445,023 cubic meters
in 2022
Suriname
158,867 cubic meters
in 2022
Iceland rank
1st
Suriname rank
3rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Iceland
  • Suriname
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119912022

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 445,023 cubic meters against 158,867 cubic meters in Suriname, a difference of 286,156 cubic meters.

That makes Iceland's figure about 2.8 times Suriname's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 3rd of 183 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 887,253 cubic meters 312,389 cubic meters 574,864 cubic meters Iceland
1970s 789,202 cubic meters 255,107 cubic meters 534,095 cubic meters Iceland
1980s 708,373 cubic meters 255,687 cubic meters 452,686 cubic meters Iceland
1990s 638,939 cubic meters 229,156 cubic meters 409,783 cubic meters Iceland
2000s 570,906 cubic meters 193,072 cubic meters 377,834 cubic meters Iceland
2010s 511,100 cubic meters 171,396 cubic meters 339,704 cubic meters Iceland
2020s 455,089 cubic meters 160,256 cubic meters 294,833 cubic meters Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Iceland or Suriname?
Iceland, at 445,023 cubic meters against 158,867 cubic meters in Suriname as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Iceland and Suriname?
286,156 cubic meters, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Suriname?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Iceland and Suriname rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Iceland ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/iceland/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/iceland/suriname/">Iceland vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.