Hungary vs Rwanda: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Hungary
624.67 cubic meters
in 2022
Rwanda
695.92 cubic meters
in 2022
Hungary rank
148th
Rwanda rank
146th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Hungary
  • Rwanda
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k196119912022

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 695.92 cubic meters against 624.67 cubic meters in Hungary, a difference of 71.25 cubic meters.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 148th and Rwanda ranks 146th of 183 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 590.89 cubic meters 2,766 cubic meters 2,175 cubic meters Rwanda
1970s 570.48 cubic meters 2,099 cubic meters 1,528 cubic meters Rwanda
1980s 563.63 cubic meters 1,537 cubic meters 973.58 cubic meters Rwanda
1990s 581.11 cubic meters 1,303 cubic meters 722.12 cubic meters Rwanda
2000s 593.68 cubic meters 1,060 cubic meters 465.97 cubic meters Rwanda
2010s 610.54 cubic meters 828.48 cubic meters 217.93 cubic meters Rwanda
2020s 622.7 cubic meters 711.45 cubic meters 88.74 cubic meters Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Hungary or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 695.92 cubic meters against 624.67 cubic meters in Hungary as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Hungary and Rwanda?
71.25 cubic meters, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Rwanda?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Hungary and Rwanda rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Hungary ranks 148th and Rwanda ranks 146th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Rwanda: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/hungary/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/hungary/rwanda/">Hungary vs Rwanda: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.