High income vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

High income
10,984 cubic meters
in 2022
Norway
70,000 cubic meters
in 2022
High income rank
10th
Norway rank
7th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • High income
  • Norway
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119912022

How they compare

Norway currently reports 70,000 cubic meters against 10,984 cubic meters in High income, a difference of 59,016 cubic meters.

That makes Norway's figure about 6.4 times High income's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

High income ranks 10th and Norway ranks 7th of 45 groups.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 13,190 cubic meters 102,565 cubic meters 89,375 cubic meters Norway
1970s 12,001 cubic meters 95,847 cubic meters 83,846 cubic meters Norway
1980s 11,113 cubic meters 92,032 cubic meters 80,920 cubic meters Norway
1990s 12,110 cubic meters 87,885 cubic meters 75,775 cubic meters Norway
2000s 11,860 cubic meters 82,567 cubic meters 70,707 cubic meters Norway
2010s 11,215 cubic meters 74,327 cubic meters 63,112 cubic meters Norway
2020s 10,964 cubic meters 70,548 cubic meters 59,584 cubic meters Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, High income or Norway?
Norway, at 70,000 cubic meters against 10,984 cubic meters in High income as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between High income and Norway?
59,016 cubic meters, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Norway?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do High income and Norway rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
High income ranks 10th and Norway ranks 7th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/high-income/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/high-income/norway/">High income vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.