Guinea vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Guinea
16,080 cubic meters
in 2022
Sweden
16,306 cubic meters
in 2022
Guinea rank
38th
Sweden rank
37th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Guinea
  • Sweden
20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k196119912022

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 16,306 cubic meters against 16,080 cubic meters in Guinea, a difference of 226 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 37th of 183 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 58,104 cubic meters 22,109 cubic meters 35,996 cubic meters Guinea
1970s 49,057 cubic meters 20,908 cubic meters 28,149 cubic meters Guinea
1980s 40,675 cubic meters 20,438 cubic meters 20,236 cubic meters Guinea
1990s 30,684 cubic meters 19,531 cubic meters 11,153 cubic meters Guinea
2000s 24,663 cubic meters 18,916 cubic meters 5,747 cubic meters Guinea
2010s 19,483 cubic meters 17,487 cubic meters 1,996 cubic meters Guinea
2020s 16,488 cubic meters 16,413 cubic meters 75.23 cubic meters Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Guinea or Sweden?
Sweden, at 16,306 cubic meters against 16,080 cubic meters in Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Guinea and Sweden?
226 cubic meters, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Guinea and Sweden rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Guinea ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 37th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/guinea/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/guinea/sweden/">Guinea vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.