Guinea vs IDA blend: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Guinea
16,080 cubic meters
in 2022
IDA blend
2,842 cubic meters
in 2022
Guinea rank
38th
IDA blend rank
35th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Guinea
  • IDA blend
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119912022

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 16,080 cubic meters against 2,842 cubic meters in IDA blend, a difference of 13,238 cubic meters.

That makes Guinea's figure about 5.7 times IDA blend's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 38th and IDA blend ranks 35th of 183 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea IDA blend Difference Ahead
1960s 58,104 cubic meters 13,896 cubic meters 44,209 cubic meters Guinea
1970s 49,057 cubic meters 10,728 cubic meters 38,329 cubic meters Guinea
1980s 40,675 cubic meters 7,814 cubic meters 32,861 cubic meters Guinea
1990s 30,684 cubic meters 5,537 cubic meters 25,147 cubic meters Guinea
2000s 24,663 cubic meters 4,205 cubic meters 20,458 cubic meters Guinea
2010s 19,483 cubic meters 3,312 cubic meters 16,171 cubic meters Guinea
2020s 16,488 cubic meters 2,900 cubic meters 13,589 cubic meters Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Guinea or IDA blend?
Guinea, at 16,080 cubic meters against 2,842 cubic meters in IDA blend as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Guinea and IDA blend?
13,238 cubic meters, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and IDA blend?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Guinea and IDA blend rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Guinea ranks 38th and IDA blend ranks 35th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs IDA blend: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/guinea/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/guinea/ida-blend/">Guinea vs IDA blend: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.