Guatemala vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Guatemala
6,118 cubic meters
in 2022
Nepal
6,670 cubic meters
in 2022
Guatemala rank
62nd
Nepal rank
59th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nepal
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119912022

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 6,670 cubic meters against 6,118 cubic meters in Guatemala, a difference of 552 cubic meters.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 59th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 23,300 cubic meters 17,742 cubic meters 5,558 cubic meters Guatemala
1970s 18,134 cubic meters 14,467 cubic meters 3,667 cubic meters Guatemala
1980s 14,122 cubic meters 11,516 cubic meters 2,606 cubic meters Guatemala
1990s 10,771 cubic meters 9,089 cubic meters 1,682 cubic meters Guatemala
2000s 8,465 cubic meters 7,621 cubic meters 844.05 cubic meters Guatemala
2010s 6,922 cubic meters 7,133 cubic meters 211.49 cubic meters Nepal
2020s 6,205 cubic meters 6,746 cubic meters 540.65 cubic meters Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Guatemala or Nepal?
Nepal, at 6,670 cubic meters against 6,118 cubic meters in Guatemala as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Guatemala and Nepal?
552 cubic meters, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nepal?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Guatemala and Nepal rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Guatemala ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 59th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/guatemala/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/guatemala/nepal/">Guatemala vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.