Germany vs Tanzania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

Germany
1,286 cubic meters
in 2022
Tanzania
1,298 cubic meters
in 2022
Germany rank
118th
Tanzania rank
117th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters) over time

  • Germany
  • Tanzania
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119912022

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 1,298 cubic meters against 1,286 cubic meters in Germany, a difference of 12 cubic meters.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 118th and Tanzania ranks 117th of 183 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 1,412 cubic meters 7,333 cubic meters 5,921 cubic meters Tanzania
1970s 1,364 cubic meters 5,329 cubic meters 3,965 cubic meters Tanzania
1980s 1,370 cubic meters 3,812 cubic meters 2,442 cubic meters Tanzania
1990s 1,317 cubic meters 2,848 cubic meters 1,531 cubic meters Tanzania
2000s 1,300 cubic meters 2,179 cubic meters 878.91 cubic meters Tanzania
2010s 1,310 cubic meters 1,643 cubic meters 332.83 cubic meters Tanzania
2020s 1,286 cubic meters 1,338 cubic meters 51.16 cubic meters Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Germany or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 1,298 cubic meters against 1,286 cubic meters in Germany as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Germany and Tanzania?
12 cubic meters, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Tanzania?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Germany and Tanzania rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Germany ranks 118th and Tanzania ranks 117th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Tanzania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/germany/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/germany/tanzania/">Germany vs Tanzania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.