Germany vs Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Germany
1,286 cubic meters
in 2022
Korea
1,255 cubic meters
in 2022
Germany rank
118th
Korea rank
120th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Germany
  • Korea
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119912022

How they compare

Germany currently reports 1,286 cubic meters against 1,255 cubic meters in Korea, a difference of 31 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Korea ahead.

Germany ranks 118th and Korea ranks 120th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Korea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 1,412 cubic meters 2,270 cubic meters 858.04 cubic meters Korea
1970s 1,364 cubic meters 1,860 cubic meters 495.99 cubic meters Korea
1980s 1,370 cubic meters 1,605 cubic meters 234.82 cubic meters Korea
1990s 1,317 cubic meters 1,448 cubic meters 130.73 cubic meters Korea
2000s 1,300 cubic meters 1,347 cubic meters 46.87 cubic meters Korea
2010s 1,310 cubic meters 1,277 cubic meters 32.9 cubic meters Germany
2020s 1,286 cubic meters 1,253 cubic meters 33.48 cubic meters Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Germany or Korea?
Germany, at 1,286 cubic meters against 1,255 cubic meters in Korea as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Germany and Korea?
31 cubic meters, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Korea?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Germany and Korea rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Germany ranks 118th and Korea ranks 120th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/germany/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/germany/korea-rep/">Germany vs Korea: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.