Georgia vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Georgia
15,658 cubic meters
in 2022
Sweden
16,306 cubic meters
in 2022
Georgia rank
39th
Sweden rank
37th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Georgia
  • Sweden
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119912022

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 16,306 cubic meters against 15,658 cubic meters in Georgia, a difference of 648 cubic meters.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 39th and Sweden ranks 37th of 183 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 12,781 cubic meters 19,436 cubic meters 6,654 cubic meters Sweden
2000s 14,814 cubic meters 18,916 cubic meters 4,102 cubic meters Sweden
2010s 15,570 cubic meters 17,487 cubic meters 1,917 cubic meters Sweden
2020s 15,649 cubic meters 16,413 cubic meters 764.13 cubic meters Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Georgia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 16,306 cubic meters against 15,658 cubic meters in Georgia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Georgia and Sweden?
648 cubic meters, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sweden?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Georgia and Sweden rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Georgia ranks 39th and Sweden ranks 37th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/georgia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/georgia/sweden/">Georgia vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.