Georgia vs South Asia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Georgia
15,658 cubic meters
in 2022
South Asia
1,141 cubic meters
in 2022
Georgia rank
39th
South Asia rank
40th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Georgia
  • South Asia
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119912022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 15,658 cubic meters against 1,141 cubic meters in South Asia, a difference of 14,517 cubic meters.

That makes Georgia's figure about 13.7 times South Asia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 39th and South Asia ranks 40th of 183 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia South Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 12,781 cubic meters 1,665 cubic meters 11,116 cubic meters Georgia
2000s 14,814 cubic meters 1,413 cubic meters 13,401 cubic meters Georgia
2010s 15,570 cubic meters 1,232 cubic meters 14,337 cubic meters Georgia
2020s 15,649 cubic meters 1,150 cubic meters 14,499 cubic meters Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Georgia or South Asia?
Georgia, at 15,658 cubic meters against 1,141 cubic meters in South Asia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Georgia and South Asia?
14,517 cubic meters, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Asia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Georgia and South Asia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Georgia ranks 39th and South Asia ranks 40th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs South Asia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/georgia/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/georgia/south-asia/">Georgia vs South Asia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.