Georgia vs Madagascar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Georgia
15,658 cubic meters
in 2022
Madagascar
11,072 cubic meters
in 2022
Georgia rank
39th
Madagascar rank
42nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Georgia
  • Madagascar
20.0k40.0k60.0k196119912022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 15,658 cubic meters against 11,072 cubic meters in Madagascar, a difference of 4,586 cubic meters.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Madagascar ahead.

Georgia ranks 39th and Madagascar ranks 42nd of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Madagascar Difference Ahead
1990s 12,781 cubic meters 23,640 cubic meters 10,859 cubic meters Madagascar
2000s 14,814 cubic meters 17,915 cubic meters 3,101 cubic meters Madagascar
2010s 15,570 cubic meters 13,485 cubic meters 2,084 cubic meters Georgia
2020s 15,649 cubic meters 11,354 cubic meters 4,295 cubic meters Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Georgia or Madagascar?
Georgia, at 15,658 cubic meters against 11,072 cubic meters in Madagascar as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Georgia and Madagascar?
4,586 cubic meters, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Madagascar?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Georgia and Madagascar rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Georgia ranks 39th and Madagascar ranks 42nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Madagascar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/georgia/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/georgia/madagascar/">Georgia vs Madagascar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.