Georgia vs Lower middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Georgia
15,658 cubic meters
in 2022
Lower middle income
2,496 cubic meters
in 2022
Georgia rank
39th
Lower middle income rank
39th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Georgia
  • Lower middle income
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119912022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 15,658 cubic meters against 2,496 cubic meters in Lower middle income, a difference of 13,162 cubic meters.

That makes Georgia's figure about 6.3 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 39th and Lower middle income ranks 39th of 183 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 12,781 cubic meters 3,940 cubic meters 8,842 cubic meters Georgia
2000s 14,814 cubic meters 3,287 cubic meters 11,527 cubic meters Georgia
2010s 15,570 cubic meters 2,770 cubic meters 12,799 cubic meters Georgia
2020s 15,649 cubic meters 2,525 cubic meters 13,124 cubic meters Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Georgia or Lower middle income?
Georgia, at 15,658 cubic meters against 2,496 cubic meters in Lower middle income as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Georgia and Lower middle income?
13,162 cubic meters, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lower middle income?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Georgia and Lower middle income rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Georgia ranks 39th and Lower middle income ranks 39th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Lower middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/georgia/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/georgia/lower-middle-income/">Georgia vs Lower middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.