Finland vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Finland
19,258 cubic meters
in 2022
Myanmar
18,654 cubic meters
in 2022
Finland rank
31st
Myanmar rank
34th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Finland
  • Myanmar
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119912022

How they compare

Finland currently reports 19,258 cubic meters against 18,654 cubic meters in Myanmar, a difference of 604 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Finland ranks 31st and Myanmar ranks 34th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 23,477 cubic meters 41,357 cubic meters 17,880 cubic meters Myanmar
1970s 22,814 cubic meters 33,659 cubic meters 10,845 cubic meters Myanmar
1980s 21,926 cubic meters 27,755 cubic meters 5,828 cubic meters Myanmar
1990s 21,029 cubic meters 23,727 cubic meters 2,698 cubic meters Myanmar
2000s 20,399 cubic meters 21,283 cubic meters 883.95 cubic meters Myanmar
2010s 19,604 cubic meters 19,727 cubic meters 122.7 cubic meters Myanmar
2020s 19,306 cubic meters 18,784 cubic meters 522.1 cubic meters Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Finland or Myanmar?
Finland, at 19,258 cubic meters against 18,654 cubic meters in Myanmar as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Finland and Myanmar?
604 cubic meters, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Myanmar?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Finland and Myanmar rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Finland ranks 31st and Myanmar ranks 34th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/finland/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/finland/myanmar/">Finland vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.