Finland vs Low income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Finland
19,258 cubic meters
in 2022
Low income
3,260 cubic meters
in 2022
Finland rank
31st
Low income rank
31st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Finland
  • Low income
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119912022

How they compare

Finland currently reports 19,258 cubic meters against 3,260 cubic meters in Low income, a difference of 15,998 cubic meters.

That makes Finland's figure about 5.9 times Low income's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 31st and Low income ranks 31st of 183 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Low income Difference Ahead
1960s 23,477 cubic meters 19,162 cubic meters 4,315 cubic meters Finland
1970s 22,814 cubic meters 14,946 cubic meters 7,867 cubic meters Finland
1980s 21,926 cubic meters 11,685 cubic meters 10,241 cubic meters Finland
1990s 21,029 cubic meters 8,058 cubic meters 12,971 cubic meters Finland
2000s 20,399 cubic meters 5,717 cubic meters 14,682 cubic meters Finland
2010s 19,604 cubic meters 4,075 cubic meters 15,528 cubic meters Finland
2020s 19,306 cubic meters 3,349 cubic meters 15,958 cubic meters Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Finland or Low income?
Finland, at 19,258 cubic meters against 3,260 cubic meters in Low income as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Finland and Low income?
15,998 cubic meters, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Low income?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Finland and Low income rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Finland ranks 31st and Low income ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Low income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/finland/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/finland/low-income/">Finland vs Low income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.