European Union vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

European Union
3,041 cubic meters
in 2022
Malaysia
16,717 cubic meters
in 2022
European Union rank
35th
Malaysia rank
36th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters) over time

  • European Union
  • Malaysia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119912022

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 16,717 cubic meters against 3,041 cubic meters in European Union, a difference of 13,676 cubic meters.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 5.5 times European Union's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

European Union ranks 35th and Malaysia ranks 36th of 47 groups.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 3,561 cubic meters 64,315 cubic meters 60,754 cubic meters Malaysia
1970s 3,345 cubic meters 51,285 cubic meters 47,941 cubic meters Malaysia
1980s 3,211 cubic meters 38,828 cubic meters 35,616 cubic meters Malaysia
1990s 3,188 cubic meters 29,003 cubic meters 25,814 cubic meters Malaysia
2000s 3,126 cubic meters 22,798 cubic meters 19,672 cubic meters Malaysia
2010s 3,064 cubic meters 18,751 cubic meters 15,687 cubic meters Malaysia
2020s 3,044 cubic meters 16,917 cubic meters 13,873 cubic meters Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, European Union or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 16,717 cubic meters against 3,041 cubic meters in European Union as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between European Union and Malaysia?
13,676 cubic meters, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union and Malaysia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do European Union and Malaysia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
European Union ranks 35th and Malaysia ranks 36th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/european-union/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/european-union/malaysia/">European Union vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.