Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
2,666 cubic meters
in 2022
Georgia
15,658 cubic meters
in 2022
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
39th
Georgia rank
39th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Georgia
5.0k10.0k15.0k199220072022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 15,658 cubic meters against 2,666 cubic meters in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 12,992 cubic meters.

That makes Georgia's figure about 5.9 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 39th and Georgia ranks 39th of 47 groups.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,186 cubic meters 12,781 cubic meters 9,596 cubic meters Georgia
2000s 3,041 cubic meters 14,814 cubic meters 11,773 cubic meters Georgia
2010s 2,796 cubic meters 15,570 cubic meters 12,773 cubic meters Georgia
2020s 2,662 cubic meters 15,649 cubic meters 12,987 cubic meters Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Georgia?
Georgia, at 15,658 cubic meters against 2,666 cubic meters in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Georgia?
12,992 cubic meters, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Georgia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Georgia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 39th and Georgia ranks 39th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/georgia/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.