Euro area vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

Euro area
3,010 cubic meters
in 2022
Myanmar
18,654 cubic meters
in 2022
Euro area rank
36th
Myanmar rank
34th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters) over time

  • Euro area
  • Myanmar
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119912022

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 18,654 cubic meters against 3,010 cubic meters in Euro area, a difference of 15,644 cubic meters.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 6.2 times Euro area's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 36th and Myanmar ranks 34th of 47 groups.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 3,493 cubic meters 41,357 cubic meters 37,864 cubic meters Myanmar
1970s 3,291 cubic meters 33,659 cubic meters 30,367 cubic meters Myanmar
1980s 3,178 cubic meters 27,755 cubic meters 24,577 cubic meters Myanmar
1990s 3,211 cubic meters 23,727 cubic meters 20,516 cubic meters Myanmar
2000s 3,135 cubic meters 21,283 cubic meters 18,148 cubic meters Myanmar
2010s 3,050 cubic meters 19,727 cubic meters 16,677 cubic meters Myanmar
2020s 3,016 cubic meters 18,784 cubic meters 15,768 cubic meters Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Euro area or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 18,654 cubic meters against 3,010 cubic meters in Euro area as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Euro area and Myanmar?
15,644 cubic meters, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Myanmar?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Euro area and Myanmar rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Euro area ranks 36th and Myanmar ranks 34th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/euro-area/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/euro-area/myanmar/">Euro area vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.