Euro area vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Euro area
3,010 cubic meters
in 2022
Iceland
445,023 cubic meters
in 2022
Euro area rank
2nd
Iceland rank
1st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Euro area
  • Iceland
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119912022

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 445,023 cubic meters against 3,010 cubic meters in Euro area, a difference of 442,013 cubic meters.

That makes Iceland's figure about 147.8 times Euro area's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 2nd and Iceland ranks 1st of 2 groups.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 3,493 cubic meters 887,253 cubic meters 883,759 cubic meters Iceland
1970s 3,291 cubic meters 789,202 cubic meters 785,910 cubic meters Iceland
1980s 3,178 cubic meters 708,373 cubic meters 705,195 cubic meters Iceland
1990s 3,211 cubic meters 638,939 cubic meters 635,728 cubic meters Iceland
2000s 3,135 cubic meters 570,906 cubic meters 567,771 cubic meters Iceland
2010s 3,050 cubic meters 511,100 cubic meters 508,050 cubic meters Iceland
2020s 3,016 cubic meters 455,089 cubic meters 452,073 cubic meters Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Euro area or Iceland?
Iceland, at 445,023 cubic meters against 3,010 cubic meters in Euro area as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Euro area and Iceland?
442,013 cubic meters, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Iceland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Euro area and Iceland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Euro area ranks 2nd and Iceland ranks 1st of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/euro-area/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/euro-area/iceland/">Euro area vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.