Euro area vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

Euro area
3,010 cubic meters
in 2022
Georgia
15,658 cubic meters
in 2022
Euro area rank
36th
Georgia rank
39th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters) over time

  • Euro area
  • Georgia
5.0k10.0k15.0k196119912022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 15,658 cubic meters against 3,010 cubic meters in Euro area, a difference of 12,648 cubic meters.

That makes Georgia's figure about 5.2 times Euro area's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 36th and Georgia ranks 39th of 47 groups.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,233 cubic meters 12,781 cubic meters 9,548 cubic meters Georgia
2000s 3,135 cubic meters 14,814 cubic meters 11,679 cubic meters Georgia
2010s 3,050 cubic meters 15,570 cubic meters 12,520 cubic meters Georgia
2020s 3,016 cubic meters 15,649 cubic meters 12,633 cubic meters Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Euro area or Georgia?
Georgia, at 15,658 cubic meters against 3,010 cubic meters in Euro area as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Euro area and Georgia?
12,648 cubic meters, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Georgia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Euro area and Georgia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Euro area ranks 36th and Georgia ranks 39th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/euro-area/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/euro-area/georgia/">Euro area vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.