Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Eswatini
2,166 cubic meters
in 2022
Puerto Rico
2,205 cubic meters
in 2022
Eswatini rank
102nd
Puerto Rico rank
100th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Eswatini
  • Puerto Rico
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119912022

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 2,205 cubic meters against 2,166 cubic meters in Eswatini, a difference of 39 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 102nd and Puerto Rico ranks 100th of 183 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 6,800 cubic meters 2,768 cubic meters 4,033 cubic meters Eswatini
1970s 5,277 cubic meters 2,410 cubic meters 2,868 cubic meters Eswatini
1980s 3,797 cubic meters 2,115 cubic meters 1,681 cubic meters Eswatini
1990s 2,733 cubic meters 1,936 cubic meters 796.89 cubic meters Eswatini
2000s 2,457 cubic meters 1,868 cubic meters 589.11 cubic meters Eswatini
2010s 2,313 cubic meters 2,014 cubic meters 298.65 cubic meters Eswatini
2020s 2,189 cubic meters 2,182 cubic meters 7.57 cubic meters Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Eswatini or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 2,205 cubic meters against 2,166 cubic meters in Eswatini as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
39 cubic meters, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Puerto Rico rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Eswatini ranks 102nd and Puerto Rico ranks 100th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/">Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.