Estonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Estonia
9,423 cubic meters
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe
9,633 cubic meters
in 2022
Estonia rank
48th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
47th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Estonia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k196119912022

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 9,633 cubic meters against 9,423 cubic meters in Estonia, a difference of 210 cubic meters.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 48th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 47th of 183 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 8,838 cubic meters 16,089 cubic meters 7,251 cubic meters Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 9,340 cubic meters 13,686 cubic meters 4,346 cubic meters Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 9,620 cubic meters 11,031 cubic meters 1,411 cubic meters Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 9,511 cubic meters 9,827 cubic meters 316.04 cubic meters Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Estonia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 9,633 cubic meters against 9,423 cubic meters in Estonia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Estonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
210 cubic meters, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Estonia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Estonia ranks 48th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 47th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/estonia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/estonia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Estonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.