Eritrea vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Eritrea
821.25 cubic meters
in 2022
Uganda
824.3 cubic meters
in 2022
Eritrea rank
136th
Uganda rank
135th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Eritrea
  • Uganda
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119912022

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 824.3 cubic meters against 821.25 cubic meters in Eritrea, a difference of 3.05 cubic meters.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 136th and Uganda ranks 135th of 183 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 1,360 cubic meters 1,838 cubic meters 477.48 cubic meters Uganda
2000s 1,090 cubic meters 1,423 cubic meters 332.61 cubic meters Uganda
2010s 904.95 cubic meters 1,054 cubic meters 149.51 cubic meters Uganda
2020s 835.92 cubic meters 850.34 cubic meters 14.42 cubic meters Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Eritrea or Uganda?
Uganda, at 824.3 cubic meters against 821.25 cubic meters in Eritrea as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Eritrea and Uganda?
3.05 cubic meters, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Uganda?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do Eritrea and Uganda rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Eritrea ranks 136th and Uganda ranks 135th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/eritrea/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/eritrea/uganda/">Eritrea vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.