Equatorial Guinea vs Madagascar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Equatorial Guinea
14,416 cubic meters
in 2022
Madagascar
11,072 cubic meters
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
40th
Madagascar rank
42nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Madagascar
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119912022

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 14,416 cubic meters against 11,072 cubic meters in Madagascar, a difference of 3,344 cubic meters.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Madagascar's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Madagascar ranks 42nd of 183 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 87,259 cubic meters 57,989 cubic meters 29,270 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
1970s 88,521 cubic meters 44,343 cubic meters 44,178 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
1980s 71,273 cubic meters 32,911 cubic meters 38,362 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
1990s 46,583 cubic meters 24,421 cubic meters 22,162 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2000s 28,944 cubic meters 17,915 cubic meters 11,029 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2010s 18,421 cubic meters 13,485 cubic meters 4,935 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2020s 14,782 cubic meters 11,354 cubic meters 3,428 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Madagascar?
Equatorial Guinea, at 14,416 cubic meters against 11,072 cubic meters in Madagascar as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar?
3,344 cubic meters, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Madagascar ranks 42nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Madagascar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/equatorial-guinea/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/equatorial-guinea/madagascar/">Equatorial Guinea vs Madagascar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.