Equatorial Guinea vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Equatorial Guinea
14,416 cubic meters
in 2022
Georgia
15,658 cubic meters
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
40th
Georgia rank
39th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Georgia
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119912022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 15,658 cubic meters against 14,416 cubic meters in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1,242 cubic meters.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Georgia ranks 39th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 44,773 cubic meters 12,781 cubic meters 31,992 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2000s 28,944 cubic meters 14,814 cubic meters 14,130 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2010s 18,421 cubic meters 15,570 cubic meters 2,851 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2020s 14,782 cubic meters 15,649 cubic meters 866.9 cubic meters Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Georgia?
Georgia, at 15,658 cubic meters against 14,416 cubic meters in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Georgia?
1,242 cubic meters, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Georgia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Georgia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Georgia ranks 39th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/equatorial-guinea/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/equatorial-guinea/georgia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.