El Salvador vs South Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

El Salvador
2,489 cubic meters
in 2022
South Sudan
2,359 cubic meters
in 2022
El Salvador rank
92nd
South Sudan rank
94th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • El Salvador
  • South Sudan
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119912022

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 2,489 cubic meters against 2,359 cubic meters in South Sudan, a difference of 130 cubic meters.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 92nd and South Sudan ranks 94th of 183 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 2,528 cubic meters 2,425 cubic meters 103.61 cubic meters El Salvador
2020s 2,498 cubic meters 2,394 cubic meters 104 cubic meters El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, El Salvador or South Sudan?
El Salvador, at 2,489 cubic meters against 2,359 cubic meters in South Sudan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between El Salvador and South Sudan?
130 cubic meters, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and South Sudan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do El Salvador and South Sudan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
El Salvador ranks 92nd and South Sudan ranks 94th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs South Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/el-salvador/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/el-salvador/south-sudan/">El Salvador vs South Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.