Ecuador vs Nicaragua: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Ecuador
24,821 cubic meters
in 2022
Nicaragua
23,209 cubic meters
in 2022
Ecuador rank
27th
Nicaragua rank
28th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • Nicaragua
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119912022

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 24,821 cubic meters against 23,209 cubic meters in Nicaragua, a difference of 1,612 cubic meters.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 27th and Nicaragua ranks 28th of 183 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 83,597 cubic meters 75,538 cubic meters 8,059 cubic meters Ecuador
1970s 63,336 cubic meters 56,532 cubic meters 6,805 cubic meters Ecuador
1980s 48,358 cubic meters 42,885 cubic meters 5,473 cubic meters Ecuador
1990s 38,660 cubic meters 34,213 cubic meters 4,447 cubic meters Ecuador
2000s 32,282 cubic meters 29,385 cubic meters 2,897 cubic meters Ecuador
2010s 27,405 cubic meters 25,609 cubic meters 1,796 cubic meters Ecuador
2020s 25,018 cubic meters 23,504 cubic meters 1,514 cubic meters Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Ecuador or Nicaragua?
Ecuador, at 24,821 cubic meters against 23,209 cubic meters in Nicaragua as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Ecuador and Nicaragua?
1,612 cubic meters, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nicaragua?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and Nicaragua rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Ecuador ranks 27th and Nicaragua ranks 28th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Nicaragua: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/ecuador/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/ecuador/nicaragua/">Ecuador vs Nicaragua: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.