Ecuador vs IDA total: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Ecuador
24,821 cubic meters
in 2022
IDA total
3,750 cubic meters
in 2022
Ecuador rank
27th
IDA total rank
28th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • IDA total
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119912022

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 24,821 cubic meters against 3,750 cubic meters in IDA total, a difference of 21,071 cubic meters.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 6.6 times IDA total's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 27th and IDA total ranks 28th of 183 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador IDA total Difference Ahead
1960s 83,597 cubic meters 17,074 cubic meters 66,522 cubic meters Ecuador
1970s 63,336 cubic meters 13,357 cubic meters 49,980 cubic meters Ecuador
1980s 48,358 cubic meters 10,202 cubic meters 38,156 cubic meters Ecuador
1990s 38,660 cubic meters 7,472 cubic meters 31,188 cubic meters Ecuador
2000s 32,282 cubic meters 5,707 cubic meters 26,575 cubic meters Ecuador
2010s 27,405 cubic meters 4,444 cubic meters 22,962 cubic meters Ecuador
2020s 25,018 cubic meters 3,831 cubic meters 21,187 cubic meters Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Ecuador or IDA total?
Ecuador, at 24,821 cubic meters against 3,750 cubic meters in IDA total as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Ecuador and IDA total?
21,071 cubic meters, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and IDA total?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and IDA total rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Ecuador ranks 27th and IDA total ranks 28th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs IDA total: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/ecuador/ida-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/ecuador/ida-total/">Ecuador vs IDA total: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.