East Asia & Pacific vs Uruguay: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

East Asia & Pacific
4,306 cubic meters
in 2022
Uruguay
27,190 cubic meters
in 2022
East Asia & Pacific rank
21st
Uruguay rank
23rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Uruguay
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119912022

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 27,190 cubic meters against 4,306 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 22,884 cubic meters.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 6.3 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 47 groups.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 9,007 cubic meters 34,480 cubic meters 25,473 cubic meters Uruguay
1970s 7,250 cubic meters 32,192 cubic meters 24,942 cubic meters Uruguay
1980s 6,158 cubic meters 30,601 cubic meters 24,442 cubic meters Uruguay
1990s 5,329 cubic meters 28,993 cubic meters 23,664 cubic meters Uruguay
2000s 4,826 cubic meters 28,053 cubic meters 23,227 cubic meters Uruguay
2010s 4,478 cubic meters 27,434 cubic meters 22,956 cubic meters Uruguay
2020s 4,315 cubic meters 27,153 cubic meters 22,838 cubic meters Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, East Asia & Pacific or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 27,190 cubic meters against 4,306 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between East Asia & Pacific and Uruguay?
22,884 cubic meters, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Uruguay?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Uruguay rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Uruguay: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/east-asia-and-pacific/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/east-asia-and-pacific/uruguay/">East Asia & Pacific vs Uruguay: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.