East Asia & Pacific vs Russia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

East Asia & Pacific
4,306 cubic meters
in 2022
Russia
29,895 cubic meters
in 2022
East Asia & Pacific rank
21st
Russia rank
20th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Russia
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119912022

How they compare

Russia currently reports 29,895 cubic meters against 4,306 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 25,589 cubic meters.

That makes Russia's figure about 6.9 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 21st and Russia ranks 20th of 47 groups.

Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Russia Difference Ahead
1990s 5,260 cubic meters 29,117 cubic meters 23,857 cubic meters Russia
2000s 4,826 cubic meters 29,916 cubic meters 25,089 cubic meters Russia
2010s 4,478 cubic meters 29,882 cubic meters 25,404 cubic meters Russia
2020s 4,315 cubic meters 29,791 cubic meters 25,476 cubic meters Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, East Asia & Pacific or Russia?
Russia, at 29,895 cubic meters against 4,306 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between East Asia & Pacific and Russia?
25,589 cubic meters, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Russia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Russia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 21st and Russia ranks 20th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Russia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/east-asia-and-pacific/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/east-asia-and-pacific/russian-federation/">East Asia & Pacific vs Russia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.