East Asia & Pacific vs Panama: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

East Asia & Pacific
4,306 cubic meters
in 2022
Panama
31,040 cubic meters
in 2022
East Asia & Pacific rank
21st
Panama rank
19th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Panama
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119912022

How they compare

Panama currently reports 31,040 cubic meters against 4,306 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 26,734 cubic meters.

That makes Panama's figure about 7.2 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 21st and Panama ranks 19th of 47 groups.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 9,007 cubic meters 104,772 cubic meters 95,765 cubic meters Panama
1970s 7,250 cubic meters 80,286 cubic meters 73,036 cubic meters Panama
1980s 6,158 cubic meters 62,998 cubic meters 56,840 cubic meters Panama
1990s 5,329 cubic meters 50,773 cubic meters 45,444 cubic meters Panama
2000s 4,826 cubic meters 41,716 cubic meters 36,889 cubic meters Panama
2010s 4,478 cubic meters 34,853 cubic meters 30,375 cubic meters Panama
2020s 4,315 cubic meters 31,431 cubic meters 27,116 cubic meters Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, East Asia & Pacific or Panama?
Panama, at 31,040 cubic meters against 4,306 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between East Asia & Pacific and Panama?
26,734 cubic meters, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Panama?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Panama rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 21st and Panama ranks 19th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Panama: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/east-asia-and-pacific/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/east-asia-and-pacific/panama/">East Asia & Pacific vs Panama: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.