East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Ecuador: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 24,821 cubic meters against 4,118 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 20,703 cubic meters.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 6.0 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 25th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 47 groups.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,967 cubic meters | 83,597 cubic meters | 74,629 cubic meters | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 7,142 cubic meters | 63,336 cubic meters | 56,194 cubic meters | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 6,022 cubic meters | 48,358 cubic meters | 42,335 cubic meters | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 5,163 cubic meters | 38,660 cubic meters | 33,497 cubic meters | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 4,650 cubic meters | 32,282 cubic meters | 27,632 cubic meters | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 4,296 cubic meters | 27,405 cubic meters | 23,110 cubic meters | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 4,128 cubic meters | 25,018 cubic meters | 20,889 cubic meters | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 24,821 cubic meters against 4,118 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Ecuador?
- 20,703 cubic meters, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Ecuador?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Ecuador rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 25th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.