Dominica vs Thailand: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Dominica
2,993 cubic meters
in 2022
Thailand
3,130 cubic meters
in 2022
Dominica rank
84th
Thailand rank
81st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Dominica
  • Thailand
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119912022

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 3,130 cubic meters against 2,993 cubic meters in Dominica, a difference of 137 cubic meters.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Dominica ranks 84th and Thailand ranks 81st of 183 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 3,120 cubic meters 7,123 cubic meters 4,003 cubic meters Thailand
1970s 2,811 cubic meters 5,585 cubic meters 2,775 cubic meters Thailand
1980s 2,786 cubic meters 4,522 cubic meters 1,737 cubic meters Thailand
1990s 2,885 cubic meters 3,837 cubic meters 952.2 cubic meters Thailand
2000s 2,914 cubic meters 3,421 cubic meters 507.45 cubic meters Thailand
2010s 2,892 cubic meters 3,196 cubic meters 304.38 cubic meters Thailand
2020s 2,976 cubic meters 3,131 cubic meters 154.95 cubic meters Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Dominica or Thailand?
Thailand, at 3,130 cubic meters against 2,993 cubic meters in Dominica as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Dominica and Thailand?
137 cubic meters, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Thailand?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Dominica and Thailand rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Dominica ranks 84th and Thailand ranks 81st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Thailand: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/dominica/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/dominica/thailand/">Dominica vs Thailand: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.