Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Costa Rica
22,236 cubic meters
in 2022
Ecuador
24,821 cubic meters
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
29th
Ecuador rank
27th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119912022

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 24,821 cubic meters against 22,236 cubic meters in Costa Rica, a difference of 2,585 cubic meters.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 29th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 183 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 71,800 cubic meters 83,597 cubic meters 11,796 cubic meters Ecuador
1970s 54,814 cubic meters 63,336 cubic meters 8,522 cubic meters Ecuador
1980s 41,951 cubic meters 48,358 cubic meters 6,407 cubic meters Ecuador
1990s 32,504 cubic meters 38,660 cubic meters 6,156 cubic meters Ecuador
2000s 26,784 cubic meters 32,282 cubic meters 5,498 cubic meters Ecuador
2010s 23,627 cubic meters 27,405 cubic meters 3,778 cubic meters Ecuador
2020s 22,338 cubic meters 25,018 cubic meters 2,680 cubic meters Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Costa Rica or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 24,821 cubic meters against 22,236 cubic meters in Costa Rica as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Costa Rica and Ecuador?
2,585 cubic meters, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ecuador?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Costa Rica and Ecuador rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Costa Rica ranks 29th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/costa-rica/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/costa-rica/ecuador/">Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.