Congo vs Vanuatu: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Congo
36,785 cubic meters
in 2022
Vanuatu
31,944 cubic meters
in 2022
Congo rank
16th
Vanuatu rank
17th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Congo
  • Vanuatu
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119912022

How they compare

Congo currently reports 36,785 cubic meters against 31,944 cubic meters in Vanuatu, a difference of 4,841 cubic meters.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Vanuatu's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 16th and Vanuatu ranks 17th of 183 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1960s 181,372 cubic meters 132,727 cubic meters 48,644 cubic meters Congo
1970s 139,802 cubic meters 101,611 cubic meters 38,191 cubic meters Congo
1980s 109,006 cubic meters 77,766 cubic meters 31,240 cubic meters Congo
1990s 82,515 cubic meters 60,824 cubic meters 21,691 cubic meters Congo
2000s 61,073 cubic meters 48,151 cubic meters 12,923 cubic meters Congo
2010s 44,262 cubic meters 38,049 cubic meters 6,213 cubic meters Congo
2020s 37,684 cubic meters 32,700 cubic meters 4,984 cubic meters Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Congo or Vanuatu?
Congo, at 36,785 cubic meters against 31,944 cubic meters in Vanuatu as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Congo and Vanuatu?
4,841 cubic meters, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Vanuatu?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Congo and Vanuatu rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Congo ranks 16th and Vanuatu ranks 17th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Vanuatu: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-rep/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-rep/vanuatu/">Congo vs Vanuatu: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.