Congo vs Panama: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Congo
36,785 cubic meters
in 2022
Panama
31,040 cubic meters
in 2022
Congo rank
16th
Panama rank
19th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Congo
  • Panama
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119912022

How they compare

Congo currently reports 36,785 cubic meters against 31,040 cubic meters in Panama, a difference of 5,745 cubic meters.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 16th and Panama ranks 19th of 183 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 183,966 cubic meters 104,772 cubic meters 79,194 cubic meters Congo
1970s 139,802 cubic meters 80,286 cubic meters 59,517 cubic meters Congo
1980s 109,006 cubic meters 62,998 cubic meters 46,008 cubic meters Congo
1990s 82,515 cubic meters 50,773 cubic meters 31,743 cubic meters Congo
2000s 61,073 cubic meters 41,716 cubic meters 19,357 cubic meters Congo
2010s 44,262 cubic meters 34,853 cubic meters 9,409 cubic meters Congo
2020s 37,684 cubic meters 31,431 cubic meters 6,253 cubic meters Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Congo or Panama?
Congo, at 36,785 cubic meters against 31,040 cubic meters in Panama as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Congo and Panama?
5,745 cubic meters, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Panama?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Congo and Panama rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Congo ranks 16th and Panama ranks 19th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Panama: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-rep/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-rep/panama/">Congo vs Panama: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.