Congo vs Liberia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Congo
36,785 cubic meters
in 2022
Liberia
37,221 cubic meters
in 2022
Congo rank
16th
Liberia rank
15th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Congo
  • Liberia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119912022

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 37,221 cubic meters against 36,785 cubic meters in Congo, a difference of 436 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 16th and Liberia ranks 15th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Liberia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 183,966 cubic meters 155,194 cubic meters 28,772 cubic meters Congo
1970s 139,802 cubic meters 121,446 cubic meters 18,356 cubic meters Congo
1980s 109,006 cubic meters 91,026 cubic meters 17,979 cubic meters Congo
1990s 82,515 cubic meters 88,496 cubic meters 5,980 cubic meters Liberia
2000s 61,073 cubic meters 60,218 cubic meters 855.49 cubic meters Congo
2010s 44,262 cubic meters 43,727 cubic meters 534.66 cubic meters Congo
2020s 37,684 cubic meters 38,029 cubic meters 345.33 cubic meters Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Congo or Liberia?
Liberia, at 37,221 cubic meters against 36,785 cubic meters in Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Congo and Liberia?
436 cubic meters, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Liberia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Congo and Liberia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Congo ranks 16th and Liberia ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Liberia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-rep/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-rep/liberia/">Congo vs Liberia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.