Congo vs Europe & Central Asia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Congo
36,785 cubic meters
in 2022
Europe & Central Asia
7,674 cubic meters
in 2022
Congo rank
16th
Europe & Central Asia rank
14th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Congo
  • Europe & Central Asia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119912022

How they compare

Congo currently reports 36,785 cubic meters against 7,674 cubic meters in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 29,111 cubic meters.

That makes Congo's figure about 4.8 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 16th and Europe & Central Asia ranks 14th of 183 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Europe & Central Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 80,157 cubic meters 8,336 cubic meters 71,821 cubic meters Congo
2000s 61,073 cubic meters 8,145 cubic meters 52,928 cubic meters Congo
2010s 44,262 cubic meters 7,832 cubic meters 36,430 cubic meters Congo
2020s 37,684 cubic meters 7,676 cubic meters 30,008 cubic meters Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Congo or Europe & Central Asia?
Congo, at 36,785 cubic meters against 7,674 cubic meters in Europe & Central Asia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Congo and Europe & Central Asia?
29,111 cubic meters, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Europe & Central Asia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Congo and Europe & Central Asia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Congo ranks 16th and Europe & Central Asia ranks 14th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Europe & Central Asia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-rep/europe-and-central-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-rep/europe-and-central-asia/">Congo vs Europe & Central Asia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.