Democratic Republic of Congo vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

Democratic Republic of Congo
8,789 cubic meters
in 2022
Slovenia
8,840 cubic meters
in 2022
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
52nd
Slovenia rank
51st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters) over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Slovenia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k196119912022

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 8,840 cubic meters against 8,789 cubic meters in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 51 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 51st of 183 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 20,412 cubic meters 9,390 cubic meters 11,022 cubic meters Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 15,597 cubic meters 9,310 cubic meters 6,287 cubic meters Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 11,331 cubic meters 9,047 cubic meters 2,284 cubic meters Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 9,081 cubic meters 8,859 cubic meters 222.09 cubic meters Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Democratic Republic of Congo or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 8,840 cubic meters against 8,789 cubic meters in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Democratic Republic of Congo and Slovenia?
51 cubic meters, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Slovenia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Slovenia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 51st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-dem-rep/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-dem-rep/slovenia/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.