Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
8,789 cubic meters
in 2022
Slovenia
8,840 cubic meters
in 2022
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
52nd
Slovenia rank
51st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Slovenia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k196119912022

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 8,840 cubic meters against 8,789 cubic meters in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 51 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 51st of 183 countries.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 20,412 cubic meters 9,390 cubic meters 11,022 cubic meters Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2000s 15,597 cubic meters 9,310 cubic meters 6,287 cubic meters Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 11,331 cubic meters 9,047 cubic meters 2,284 cubic meters Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 9,081 cubic meters 8,859 cubic meters 222.09 cubic meters Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 8,840 cubic meters against 8,789 cubic meters in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Slovenia?
51 cubic meters, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Slovenia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Slovenia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 51st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-dem-rep/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/congo-dem-rep/slovenia/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.