Colombia vs Peru: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Colombia
41,459 cubic meters
in 2022
Peru
49,021 cubic meters
in 2022
Colombia rank
13th
Peru rank
11th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Colombia
  • Peru
50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k196119912022

How they compare

Peru currently reports 49,021 cubic meters against 41,459 cubic meters in Colombia, a difference of 7,562 cubic meters.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 13th and Peru ranks 11th of 183 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 118,659 cubic meters 139,997 cubic meters 21,338 cubic meters Peru
1970s 93,177 cubic meters 108,742 cubic meters 15,565 cubic meters Peru
1980s 74,427 cubic meters 84,893 cubic meters 10,466 cubic meters Peru
1990s 60,686 cubic meters 68,273 cubic meters 7,586 cubic meters Peru
2000s 51,436 cubic meters 58,888 cubic meters 7,453 cubic meters Peru
2010s 45,694 cubic meters 53,892 cubic meters 8,198 cubic meters Peru
2020s 41,910 cubic meters 49,495 cubic meters 7,586 cubic meters Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Colombia or Peru?
Peru, at 49,021 cubic meters against 41,459 cubic meters in Colombia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Colombia and Peru?
7,562 cubic meters, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Peru?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Colombia and Peru rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Colombia ranks 13th and Peru ranks 11th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Peru: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/colombia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/colombia/peru/">Colombia vs Peru: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.