Colombia vs Congo: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Colombia
41,459 cubic meters
in 2022
Congo
36,785 cubic meters
in 2022
Colombia rank
13th
Congo rank
16th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Colombia
  • Congo
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119912022

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 41,459 cubic meters against 36,785 cubic meters in Congo, a difference of 4,674 cubic meters.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Colombia ranks 13th and Congo ranks 16th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 118,659 cubic meters 183,966 cubic meters 65,308 cubic meters Congo
1970s 93,177 cubic meters 139,802 cubic meters 46,626 cubic meters Congo
1980s 74,427 cubic meters 109,006 cubic meters 34,579 cubic meters Congo
1990s 60,686 cubic meters 82,515 cubic meters 21,829 cubic meters Congo
2000s 51,436 cubic meters 61,073 cubic meters 9,638 cubic meters Congo
2010s 45,694 cubic meters 44,262 cubic meters 1,432 cubic meters Colombia
2020s 41,910 cubic meters 37,684 cubic meters 4,226 cubic meters Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Colombia or Congo?
Colombia, at 41,459 cubic meters against 36,785 cubic meters in Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Colombia and Congo?
4,674 cubic meters, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Congo?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Colombia and Congo rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Colombia ranks 13th and Congo ranks 16th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Congo: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/colombia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/colombia/congo-rep/">Colombia vs Congo: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.