China vs Saint Lucia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

China
1,992 cubic meters
in 2022
Saint Lucia
1,678 cubic meters
in 2022
China rank
106th
Saint Lucia rank
109th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • China
  • Saint Lucia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

China currently reports 1,992 cubic meters against 1,678 cubic meters in Saint Lucia, a difference of 314 cubic meters.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Saint Lucia's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 106th and Saint Lucia ranks 109th of 183 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1960s 3,878 cubic meters 3,061 cubic meters 817.45 cubic meters China
1970s 3,128 cubic meters 2,730 cubic meters 397.95 cubic meters China
1980s 2,692 cubic meters 2,347 cubic meters 345.49 cubic meters China
1990s 2,353 cubic meters 2,043 cubic meters 309.89 cubic meters China
2000s 2,166 cubic meters 1,823 cubic meters 343.19 cubic meters China
2010s 2,047 cubic meters 1,720 cubic meters 326.78 cubic meters China
2020s 1,992 cubic meters 1,681 cubic meters 311.8 cubic meters China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, China or Saint Lucia?
China, at 1,992 cubic meters against 1,678 cubic meters in Saint Lucia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between China and Saint Lucia?
314 cubic meters, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Saint Lucia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do China and Saint Lucia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
China ranks 106th and Saint Lucia ranks 109th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Saint Lucia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/china/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/china/st-lucia/">China vs Saint Lucia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.