Chile vs Colombia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Chile
45,262 cubic meters
in 2022
Colombia
41,459 cubic meters
in 2022
Chile rank
12th
Colombia rank
13th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Chile
  • Colombia
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k140.0k196119912022

How they compare

Chile currently reports 45,262 cubic meters against 41,459 cubic meters in Colombia, a difference of 3,803 cubic meters.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.

Chile ranks 12th and Colombia ranks 13th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Colombia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Colombia Difference Ahead
1960s 98,478 cubic meters 118,659 cubic meters 20,181 cubic meters Colombia
1970s 83,737 cubic meters 93,177 cubic meters 9,440 cubic meters Colombia
1980s 71,939 cubic meters 74,427 cubic meters 2,488 cubic meters Colombia
1990s 61,547 cubic meters 60,686 cubic meters 861.03 cubic meters Chile
2000s 54,463 cubic meters 51,436 cubic meters 3,027 cubic meters Chile
2010s 49,072 cubic meters 45,694 cubic meters 3,378 cubic meters Chile
2020s 45,479 cubic meters 41,910 cubic meters 3,569 cubic meters Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Chile or Colombia?
Chile, at 45,262 cubic meters against 41,459 cubic meters in Colombia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Chile and Colombia?
3,803 cubic meters, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Colombia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Chile and Colombia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Chile ranks 12th and Colombia ranks 13th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Colombia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/chile/colombia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/chile/colombia/">Chile vs Colombia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.