Canada vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Canada
73,170 cubic meters
in 2022
Suriname
158,867 cubic meters
in 2022
Canada rank
6th
Suriname rank
3rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Canada
  • Suriname
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119912022

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 158,867 cubic meters against 73,170 cubic meters in Canada, a difference of 85,697 cubic meters.

That makes Suriname's figure about 2.2 times Canada's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 6th and Suriname ranks 3rd of 183 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 145,155 cubic meters 312,389 cubic meters 167,234 cubic meters Suriname
1970s 124,486 cubic meters 255,107 cubic meters 130,621 cubic meters Suriname
1980s 110,630 cubic meters 255,687 cubic meters 145,057 cubic meters Suriname
1990s 97,972 cubic meters 229,156 cubic meters 131,183 cubic meters Suriname
2000s 88,795 cubic meters 193,072 cubic meters 104,277 cubic meters Suriname
2010s 79,995 cubic meters 171,396 cubic meters 91,401 cubic meters Suriname
2020s 74,215 cubic meters 160,256 cubic meters 86,042 cubic meters Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Canada or Suriname?
Suriname, at 158,867 cubic meters against 73,170 cubic meters in Canada as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Canada and Suriname?
85,697 cubic meters, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Suriname?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Canada and Suriname rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Canada ranks 6th and Suriname ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/canada/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/canada/suriname/">Canada vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.