Canada vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Canada
73,170 cubic meters
in 2022
Norway
70,000 cubic meters
in 2022
Canada rank
6th
Norway rank
7th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Canada
  • Norway
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119912022

How they compare

Canada currently reports 73,170 cubic meters against 70,000 cubic meters in Norway, a difference of 3,170 cubic meters.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 6th and Norway ranks 7th of 183 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 145,155 cubic meters 102,565 cubic meters 42,591 cubic meters Canada
1970s 124,486 cubic meters 95,847 cubic meters 28,639 cubic meters Canada
1980s 110,630 cubic meters 92,032 cubic meters 18,598 cubic meters Canada
1990s 97,972 cubic meters 87,885 cubic meters 10,088 cubic meters Canada
2000s 88,795 cubic meters 82,567 cubic meters 6,228 cubic meters Canada
2010s 79,995 cubic meters 74,327 cubic meters 5,668 cubic meters Canada
2020s 74,215 cubic meters 70,548 cubic meters 3,667 cubic meters Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Canada or Norway?
Canada, at 73,170 cubic meters against 70,000 cubic meters in Norway as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Canada and Norway?
3,170 cubic meters, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Norway?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Canada and Norway rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Canada ranks 6th and Norway ranks 7th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/canada/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/canada/norway/">Canada vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.