Cape Verde vs Cyprus: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Cape Verde
577.21 cubic meters
in 2022
Cyprus
585.86 cubic meters
in 2022
Cape Verde rank
152nd
Cyprus rank
151st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Cyprus
05001.0k1.5k196119912022

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 585.86 cubic meters against 577.21 cubic meters in Cape Verde, a difference of 8.65 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 152nd and Cyprus ranks 151st of 183 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Cyprus Difference Ahead
1960s 1,229 cubic meters 1,263 cubic meters 33.19 cubic meters Cyprus
1970s 986.03 cubic meters 1,177 cubic meters 190.6 cubic meters Cyprus
1980s 870.74 cubic meters 1,075 cubic meters 204.48 cubic meters Cyprus
1990s 728.9 cubic meters 914.57 cubic meters 185.67 cubic meters Cyprus
2000s 624.09 cubic meters 761.12 cubic meters 137.03 cubic meters Cyprus
2010s 585.59 cubic meters 646.11 cubic meters 60.53 cubic meters Cyprus
2020s 580.25 cubic meters 592.31 cubic meters 12.06 cubic meters Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Cape Verde or Cyprus?
Cyprus, at 585.86 cubic meters against 577.21 cubic meters in Cape Verde as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Cape Verde and Cyprus?
8.65 cubic meters, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Cyprus?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Cape Verde and Cyprus rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Cape Verde ranks 152nd and Cyprus ranks 151st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Cyprus: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/cabo-verde/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/cabo-verde/cyprus/">Cape Verde vs Cyprus: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.