Burundi vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Burundi
755.19 cubic meters
in 2022
Zimbabwe
762.96 cubic meters
in 2022
Burundi rank
143rd
Zimbabwe rank
142nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Burundi
  • Zimbabwe
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 762.96 cubic meters against 755.19 cubic meters in Burundi, a difference of 7.77 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 3,217 cubic meters 2,759 cubic meters 457.92 cubic meters Burundi
1970s 2,653 cubic meters 2,064 cubic meters 588.52 cubic meters Burundi
1980s 2,037 cubic meters 1,454 cubic meters 582.91 cubic meters Burundi
1990s 1,700 cubic meters 1,118 cubic meters 581.89 cubic meters Burundi
2000s 1,349 cubic meters 985.17 cubic meters 364.26 cubic meters Burundi
2010s 935.12 cubic meters 858.18 cubic meters 76.94 cubic meters Burundi
2020s 776.14 cubic meters 776.21 cubic meters 0.069 cubic meters Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Burundi or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 762.96 cubic meters against 755.19 cubic meters in Burundi as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Burundi and Zimbabwe?
7.77 cubic meters, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Burundi and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Burundi ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/burundi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/burundi/zimbabwe/">Burundi vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.